Conscious Climate Conscience

Rally to free the climate prisoners

Today I participated in a post-Copenhagen rally to support an Australian, Natasha Verco, who has been detained in Denmark since 13 December on bogus charges. A group of twenty people from all around Sydney met outside the Danish Embassy in Sydney with a letter from Friends of the Earth Australia to give the Danish Ambassador.

Here is the ABC report and here is the Sydney Morning Herald.

My sign says ‘Lock-up the polluters not the people’

The story behind Tash’s arrests and the arrests of many climate protesters is very concerning. Know of the dangers of climate change to the planet and seeing the failure of the current global system to address climate issues, it is not hard to feel for the protesters. These people are passionate about climate justice and are facilitating others to speak loudly and clearly. Without these people organising the chaos, it is much more likely that groups of people angry about inaction will get violent.

Tash Verco was arrested preemptively and has been held for three weeks without bail charged with ‘incitement’. She has not been allowed to phone her mother. Tash Verco has a strong history in the Sydney environment movement having co-founded Friends of the Earth Sydney and has been involved with supporting Indigenous rights campaigns amongst other things. I met Tash through the Australian Student Environment Network (ASEN) where we participated in a rally in support of Indigenous rights.

Tash was helping organise the ‘Reclaim Power’ action in Copenhagen which was supposed to bring together people from inside the Bella Centre and from the outside in a peaceful statement that the people of the world can work this out. Instead, three days before the protest, she was arrested. Along with the arrests of other activists, this left a vacuum in the organisation of the protests and meant that there was more likely to be violence. We were told today that she could be in prison for a full year.

Tash is not alone. There were almost two thousand people arrested in Copenhagen and many are still in prison. Many people demonstrating for real climate solutions have had their hands tied. It is not fair that the lobbyists for coal and carbon polluting industries could easily access the negotiators and the people were locked-out or locked-up. The criminals are the ones selling our planet’s future for coal and oil.

Cheers

N.

NEW UPDATE Latest news from ABC is that Tash has been released = )

Copenhagen is over and this blog has only a few more stories in it at a stretch. This first one is my reflections on how I participated in the Copenhagen experience.

Personal financial reflections. The reason I could travel half way around the world for a climate conference was because I was supported financially. Money is a major limiting factor for young people participating in the United Nations. In fact, there was only one young person from Bangladesh at the Conference and this really signifies how unrepresentative money can make the playing field.

Macquarie University has given me a $1,500 scholarship which paid for accommodation ($850) and some of the flight over ($2,200). Other sponsors were Kuring-gai Council ($250) and Dr. Brendan Nelson ($150). Otherwise, the money that I spent while working in Copenhagen came from my own pocket. As far as I can gather, it amounted to $1,500.

When I tell people about Copenhagen and being an Australian Youth Delegate, there is an assumption that I was paid to go over. If the youth delegates from Australia counted the number of hours worked the cost of volunteering would certainly add up. However, this is a luxury we cannot afford. The AYCC is a non-profit volunteer organisation that is desperately short of money. If you want to go to the website here, it is easy enough to donate. Your money will be spent wisely for a safe climate.

I have recently been made aware of the millions of dollars that go into corporate lobbying on the part of the businesses that will be effected when the Australian government responds to climate change. Six figure salaries for hundreds of staff are the opposition to a bunch of young volunteers who pay their own way. Sometimes the truth is all you need. Not in this case.

What we have achieved in Copenhagen can also not be assessed in figures. When people think of Archbishop Desmond Tutu calling on the negotiators to “seal the fair, ambitious and binding deal” there is no way of measuring the volunteer hours that went into organising the event for him to speak. The media work done by AYCC with videos, radio, television, newspaper and online articles and interviews has shaped opinion in our own country, an outcome impossible to assess financially.

As we count our dollars and follow GDP with expectant eyes, it is important to remember how little these numbers mean. If money cannot provide a safe climate and clean skies in our  backyard, then what is it good for?

Cheers,

N.

Copenhagen Accord

Late last night, there was a change in the UN negotiations. There was a proposal called the Copenhagen Accord. It is a draft text of an agreement reached between China, US, India and South Africa. Here are perspectives from the Wall Street Journal, the Guardian UK and BBC News.

Of note:

1. It commits Annex 1 or Developed countries to 80% reductions on 1990 levels by 2050 and 50% reductions overall. It says nothing about 2020 reductions.

2. Pledges to keep temperature rise at 2 degrees with the potential to revise down to 1.5 by 2016. It says nothing about how this will be achieved.

3. It is a non-legally binding treaty. In fact, the draft drops a previous 2010 deadline for achieving a legally binding treaty.

4. Developed countries to support the mobilization of $100 bil per year by 2020 for developing countries. Calls were for $200 bil by African Union, Avaaz and 350.org were not heard. 

5. Copenhagen Climate Fund of $30 bil will be made available for 2010-2012 with balanced allocation between adaptation and mitigation. This amount of money will not be enough for the developing nations.

Australia is supporting the Copenhagen Accord as will many of the UN blocs such as the Umbrella Group and G77. I think it is fair to assume it will pass (with some minor changes) with the majority of nations and the majority of population.

Will it provide the rapid response the world needs for a safe climate?

After decades of negotiations and following the framework of Kyoto, the world has been expecting a ramping-up of the response to climate change. However, what we have today is a weak, non-binding accord that is endorsed by a minority of nations. Two weeks of intense negotiations have passed and what we have is a bare-bones document.

For me personally, I feel like this was the likely outcome. AYCC, youth of the world, people from AOSIS and other nations have done everyhing we thought strategic to get a stronger treaty. We continue to push and we have made our base stronger through this experience. The battle for a safe climate will not end here because we are not done yet.

What do you think?

Cheers,

N.

Dear Reader,

Today I write from a room with hundreds of climate activists working in a big hall, the NGO convergence space that has been setup in the last twelve hours. If there is one thing i have learned from COP15, it is that inspired and creative people can make something from nothing in next to no time. In fact, responding properly to global negotiations on something as complex as climate change requires a lot of flexibility and passion.

So here we are. People from all around the world typing and chatting, planning and conspiring. Conspiring, by the way, i learned tonight means ‘to breathe.’ I learned this from a person represent a climate organisation who spoke at the Vigil for Survival tonight.

You may have participated, or not, in the hunger for survival - a globally coordinated twenty-four hour fast in solidarity with the people who have fasted for forty-two days as part of Climate Justice Fast. It is amazing to be here with Anna Keenan who has amazing vitality considering her situation. We decided that the fast would go ahead not at all long ago. The vigil itself was organised by a team of ten people who began at 1:30pm. Still, we did a good job getting three-hundred people here and everyone had a great experience.

The Vigil was a deeply heart-warming hour with Bill McKibbon (350.org) and speakers from the Pacific Islands, Indigenous Americans and hosted by Deepa Gupta from Indian Youth Climate Network. We had candles, listened to talks and participated in the evening by contemplating the process so far and what we want from the future.

For me, this is so important. So many activists, the vast majority, do not take the time to reflect or contemplate the situation they are working on. I appreciate the time and space to reflect because I feel that without this reflection we cannot continue to learn and grow.

When we hear “we need to be at 350ppm and we are at 380ppm” people get worried. We feel stress and anxiety and want to fix it now. When we are activists and we spend all our time working towards this target, it can be tortuous when it does not happen, especially when this extends over time.

Bill McKibbon personifies the model climate activist. He is fundamentally realistic about the world, he works extremely hard and is committed to the science. However, he takes the time for spiritual side of the movement and does work till he passes out.

As Copenhagen begins to wrap-up, i feel sad about leaving my delegation, my team of committed, hard-working friends. However, i don’t feel like this is the end. It is the beginning. Climate activism is a hard slog, and sometimes lonely. This Copenhagen experience has deepened my appreciation for a phenomenal movement of fantastic people.

Cheers,

N.